最新钱报六考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约

　　分享兴趣，传播快乐，增长见闻，留下美好。
　　亲爱的您，
　　这里是LearingYard学苑！
　　今天小编为大家带来最新钱报（六）
　　欢迎您的用心访问！
　　本期推文阅读时长大约10分钟，请您耐心阅读。
　　Share interest, spread happiness, increase knowledge, and leave beautiful.
　　Dear you,
　　This is the LearingYard Academy!
　　Today, the editor brings you the latest money report (6)
　　Welcome your visit!
　　This tweet usually takes about 10 minutes to read. Please be patient and read.
　　注：建议阅读此文时可下载该篇文献，以便于更好学习此篇文献研究内容。
　　Note: It is recommended to read this article when you read this article so that you can better learn this document.
　　01  摘要
　　摘要：本文以一个制造商和一个零售商组成的二级绿色供应链为背景，建立了考虑产品绿色度的四种绿色供应链博弈模型：以制造商为主导的stackelberg博弈模型、以零售商为主导的stackelberg博弈模型、制造商和零售商的Nash均衡博弈模型以及集中控制模型。对四种博弈模型在产品绿色度、产品价格以及批发价格等方面进行了比较分析，并进一步建立了收益共享契约下的博弈模型。通过数值仿真探讨了收益共享系数对产品绿色度、制 造商利润和零售商利润的影响
　　分析：
　　本次小编分享的文献刊登于2015年第23卷第6期的中国管理科学 。该篇文献是较早从模型上考虑产品绿色度的供应链文章（小编自己检索发现这方面研究从2015年开始多起来，经过这几年的研究无论是在参数设置方面还是模型求解方面都已经相当成熟）
　　言归正传，这篇文献的摘要与以往的摘要略有不同，开篇没有研究意义的过度，直击研究目的。观摩学者的摘要，小编个人认为学者主要涵盖了摘要的两要素（目的、方法 ），目的为研究绿色度对一个二级供应链的各方利润、批发价格、零售价格、供应链整体利润的影响。所用的方法为stackelberg博弈模型和收益共享契约。小编以现在读者的视角来看，学者在对于研究结果和结论的详细描述没有具体体现，对其过程描写太多而忽略了具体的研究结果陈述以及研究结论的提出。因此，小编认为可以将研究结果、结论用学术用语添加上。
　　Analysis:
　　The literature shared by Xiaobian was published in Chinese Management Science, Vol. 23, No.6, 2015. This document is an early supply chain article that considers the green degree of products from the model vendor (Xiaobian＂s own search found that the research in this area began to increase in 2015, and after several years of research, it is quite mature in terms of parameter setting and model solving).Getting to the point, the abstract of this document is slightly different from the previous abstract, and the beginning of this document has no excessive research significance, but directly hits the research purpose. Observing the abstract of scholars, Xiaobian personally thinks that scholars mainly cover two elements (purpose and method) of the abstract, with the purpose of studying the influence of greenness on the profits of all parties, wholesale price, retail price and overall profits of a secondary supply chain. The methods used are stackelberg game model and revenue sharing contract. From the perspective of current readers, scholars have not embodied the detailed description of the research results and conclusions, and have described the process too much, ignoring the specific statement of the research results and the presentation of the research conclusions. Therefore, Xiaobian thinks that the research results and conclusions can be added in academic terms.
　　●  ●  ●
　　02  关键词
　　关键词：绿色供应链；产品绿色度；博弈模型；收益共享契约
　　分析：关键词是他人索引文献的关键，关键词要精简，能够抓住核心重点。关键词个数一般在2-6个之间，当然不同的期刊有不同的要求。赏析该篇文献的关键词，个数为4个，均为名词，符合关键词设置的基本要求。读者的第一、二个关键词是与研究主体相关，表明自己的研究是绿色供应链。第二类是与运用的理论、方法相关，表明自己用的博弈模型。小编觉得收益共享契约既可以归属为研究方法类关键词 也可以归属为第三类，根据研究结论提取的关键词。因为阅读该篇文献全文以后学者利用收益共享契约实现最优协调的，因此小编也将其归于第三类关键词。该篇文献的关键词提取都是从题目而来小编个人认为该关键词和题目重复了，不利于从其他关键词检索该文献。读者在自己写文献的时候既可以从题目中提取（一般关键词撰写都在文章写完之后），也可以从全文中提取，这样便于发表之后其他学者检索文献。
　　Analysis:
　　Key words are the key to others＂ indexing documents, so they should be concise and able to grasp the key points. Generally, the number of keywords is between 2 and 6. Of course, different journals have different requirements. Appreciate the keywords in this document, the number is 4, all of which are nouns, which meets the basic requirements of keyword setting. The reader＂s first and second keywords are related to the research subject, indicating that his research is green supply chain. The second category is related to the applied theory and method, and shows the game model used by oneself. I think that the revenue sharing contract of Xiaobian can be classified as either the research method keyword or the third keyword extracted according to the research conclusion. After reading the full text of this document, scholars use the revenue sharing contract to achieve optimal coordination, so Xiaobian also classified it as the third kind of keywords. The key words of this document are extracted from the title. I personally think that the key words and title are repeated, which is not conducive to retrieving this document from other keywords. When the readers write their own documents, they can either extract from the topic (generally, the key words are written after the article is finished) or from the full text, which is convenient for other scholars to search the documents after publication.
　　●  ●  ●
　　03  引言
　　分析：
　　一个好的引言象征着论文的研究意义和自己的创新之处。小编看到此篇文献的引言攥写将其归为几个部分。一，表明研究意义（从宏观层面表明自己的研究领域的研究意义和政策支持），学者的这篇文献就是从消费者对绿色环保要求提高以及国家（欧盟和我们国家）政策层面的重视表明这方面的研究。二、用实际案例证实研究需要，学者的这篇文献举了日本松下和中国海尔的案例表明企业对绿色供应链的重视。接着的文献综述，可以根据自己题目提取文献综述的关键词，表明以往学者在那些方面有了那些研究，然后评述学者的研究，突出自己的研究的不同之处和本文的研究构架。小编认为学者这篇文献的引言部分攥写方式和小编总结的方式一致。值得读者自行借鉴学习。
　　Analysis:
　　A good introduction symbolizes the research significance and innovation of the thesis. Xiaobian saw the introduction of this document and wrote it into several parts. First, it shows the research significance (identifying the research significance and policy support of one＂s own research field from the macro level). This document of scholars shows the research in this area from the improvement of consumers＂ requirements for green environmental protection and the attention of the national (EU and our country) policy level. Second, the need of research is confirmed by practical cases. This document of scholars cites the cases of Panasonic in Japan and Haier in China, which shows that enterprises attach importance to green supply chain. After that, we can extract the key words of literature review according to our own topics, and show what research scholars have done in the past, and then comment on scholars＂ research, highlighting the differences of their own research and the research framework of this paper. The author thinks that the way of writing the introduction part of this document is consistent with the way of summarizing it. It is worth learning for readers.
　　●  ●  ●
　　04  问题描述与基本模型
　　分析：
　　模型建立方面首先要表明自己的研究假设，以及符号说明，表达清楚即可，对于复杂的模型还需再流程图商标明符号以及对流程图进行说明。学者的这篇文献研究的是一个制造商和一个零售商组成的二级供应链，主体较少，因此没有流程图。学者的整个模型框架以及求解思路都很清晰。从多因素考虑建立模型，从零售商为主导、批发商为主导、零售商和批发商的纳什均衡、集中控制式进行模型建立，比较不同主要类型下的最优批发价格、绿色度，引出收入共享契约下的模型。最后通过数值仿真验证结论成立。学者的研究框架属于标准的Stackelberg博弈模型，最后为制造商投入绿色生产努力在分散情况下也能达到集中决策的情况，引入收益共享契约进行协调，学者主要做的是制造商主导情况下的收益共享契约协调。
　　Analysis:
　　In establishing the model, we should first show our research hypothesis and symbol description, and express it clearly and immediately. For complex models, we need to mark symbols in the flow chart and explain the flow chart. This document studies the secondary supply chain composed of a manufacturer and a retailer, which has few subjects, so there is no flow chart. The whole model framework and solution ideas of scholars are very clear. The model is established from multi-factors, including retailer-led, wholesaler-led, Nash equilibrium between retailer and wholesaler, and centralized control. By comparing the optimal wholesale price and greenness under different main types, the model under revenue sharing contract is derived. Finally, the conclusion is verified by numerical simulation. The research framework of the scholars belongs to the standard Stackelberg game model. Finally, for manufacturers to invest in green production efforts, they can achieve centralized decision-making under decentralized circumstances, and introduce revenue sharing contracts for coordination. Scholars mainly do the coordination of revenue sharing contracts under manufacturer-led circumstances.
　　●  ●  ●
　　05  算例分析
　　分析：
　　小编是第一次赏析绿色供应链的文章，主要看的Stackelberg博弈模型的流程方法，对于数值仿真部分没有过度详解。学者这篇文章的数值仿真主要是通过MATLAB进行参数设置，收益共享比例的调试得出的数据和绘图，对此进行了分析，读者感兴趣可以自行深究，小编不在此赘述。
　　Analysis:
　　Xiaobian is the first article to appreciate the green supply chain, which mainly focuses on the process method of Stackelberg game model, but does not explain the numerical simulation in detail. Scholars＂ numerical simulation of this article is mainly the data and drawings obtained by debugging parameters and revenue sharing ratio through MATLAB, which are analyzed, and readers can go deep into it if they are interested, so the small series will not be repeated here.
　　●  ●  ●
　　06  结语
　　分析：该篇的结语部分主要分为两段，第一段重申自己的研究问题和总结自己的研究发现，研究发现可以分条列项分析，并针对自己的研究结果提出研究建议。小编认为这部分攥写难度还是有的，因为不能和引言部分重复太多，写完之后还需要对照引言部分细细打磨。学者的结语第一段写作方式值得小编和读者们学习，该有的结构都有，没有过度的赘述和重复。第二段，学者再申自己是从哪方面那种情况下进行研究的，学者是在信息对称情况下研究的绿色供应链博弈问题，一般如果没有说明非信息对称都是在信息对称下研究的。最后，引出自己研究商不足以及进一步的研究方向。
　　●  ●  ●
　　今天的分享就到这里了。
　　如果您对今天的文章有独特的想法，
　　欢迎给我们留言，
　　让我们相约明天，
　　祝您今天过得开心快乐！
　　That＂s it for today＂s sharing.
　　If you have a unique idea about today’s article,
　　Welcome to leave us a message,
　　Let us meet tomorrow,
　　I wish you a happy day today!
　　参考资料：Google翻译
　　参考文献：2015+考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约_江世英
　　本文由LearningYard学苑整理并发出，如有侵权请在后台留言！
　　●  ●  ●