1。Themerefactthatticketsalesinrecentyearsforscreenplaybasedmovieshaveexceededthoseforbookbasedmoviesisinsufficientevidencetoconcludethatwritingscreenplaysnowprovidesgreaterfinancialopportunityforwriters。 2。Itispossiblethatfeespaidbymoviestudiosforscreenplayswilldecreaseinthefuturerelativetothoseforbookrights。 3。Theargumentfailstoruleoutthepossibilitythatawriterengageinbothtypesofwritingaswellasothertypes。 4。Inanyevent,theadvertisementprovidesnojustificationforthemutuallyexclusivechoicethatitimposesonthewriter。 5。Theargumentsimplyequatessuccesswithmovieticketsales,whichisunwarranted。 6。Theauthorassumesthatphysicalcapabilitiesaretheonlyattributesnecessarytooperateamotorvehicle。 7。Moreover,theauthorprovidesnoevidencethattherealismofcolorphotographyisthereasonforitspredominance。 8。Thisassumptionpresentsafalsedilemma,sincethetwomediaarenotnecessarilymutuallyexclusivealternatives。 9。Commonsensetellsusthataphotographercansucceedbyworkinginbothmedia。11。ThemajorproblemwiththeargumentisthatthestatedsimilaritiesbetweenCompanyAandBareinsufficienttosupporttheconclusionthatCompanyAwillsufferafatesimilartoCompanyB’s。 12。Consequently,themerefactthatCompanyAholdsalargeshareofthevideogamehardwareandsoftwaremarketdoesnotsupporttheclaimthatCompanyAwillalsofail。 13。Thus,theauthorunfairlyassumesthathighlyratedpublictelevisionprogramsarenecessarilywidelyviewed,orpopular。 14。Whilethismaybetrueinsomecases,itisequallypossiblethatonlycompanieswithproductsthatarealreadybestsellerscanaffordthehigheradratesthatpopularshowsdemand。 15。Admittedly,thevicepresident’sreasoninglinkingemployeebenefitswithcompanyprofitsseemsreasonableonthesurface。 16。Onecaninferfromthesurvey’sresultsthatafullonethirdoftherespondentsmayhaveviewedthecurrentbenefitspackageunfavorably。 17。Lackingmorespecificinformationabouthowtheseotheremployeesresponded,itisimpossibletoassessthereliabilityofthesurvey’sresultsortomakeaninformedrecommendation。 18。Itisunlikelythatthebriefoneweekperiodsundercomparisonarerepresentativeoflongertimeperiods。 19。Ifso,eventhough3percentmoreaccidentsoccurredafterthechange,theauthor’sargumentthatchangingthespeedlimitincreasesdangerfordriverswouldbeseriouslyweakened。21。Inaddition,whileitistruethatmanyvoterschangetheirmindsseveraltimesbeforevoting,andthatsomeremainundecideduntilenteringthevotingbooth,thisisnottrueofeveryone。 22。Withoutknowingtheextentandnatureofthedamageresultingfromthebadpublicityorthereasonfortheviolation,wecannotaccepttheauthor’sconclusion。 23。Theauthor’sproposalisinconsistentwiththeauthor’sconclusionabouttheconsequencesofadoptinganethicscode。 24。Tobeginwith,theauthorfailstoconsiderhealththreatsposedbyincineratingtrash。 25。Theauthor’sconclusionthatswitchingtoincinerationwouldbemoresalutaryforpublichealthwouldbeseriouslyundermined。 26。However,thisisnotnecessarilythecase。 27。Theauthor’simplicitclaimthatincineratorsareeconomicallyadvantageoustolandfillsispoorlysupported。 28。Consequently,unlesstheauthorcandemonstratethatthecitywillincurexpensesthatarenotcoveredbytheincreasedrevenuesfromtheseprojects,theauthor’sconcernabouttheseissuesisunfounded。 29。Firstofall,whileassertingthatrealincomesarerising,theauthorprovidesnoevidencetosupportthisassertion。31。Moreover,theauthorfailstoconsiderandruleoutotherfactorsthatmightaccountforproportionaldecreasesinspendingonfood。